ventracm.com → nexvia.comReview required
Identity problems stop the analysis for review
Market Dog flags website, redirect, or identity problems and stops a new analysis until your team reviews the candidate.
Tell us what you need.
Market Dog builds the study.
Describe the decision in plain language. Market Dog looks for options worth considering and checks the companies behind them. Your team can then compare the shortlist against its own priorities.
You do not need a vendor list or a finished specification to get started.
Describe your need
The idea
Replace the scattered shortlist with one decision record.
Software choices often begin in separate spreadsheets, supplier pages, architecture notes, and AI chats. Requirements change while the shortlist is being built, and important claims lose their source.
Market Dog brings the need, editable criteria, candidate research, open questions, and final human choice into one reviewable study.
A useful starting pointWe need to replace our contract tool. It must work in Europe and fit the systems we already use.
Start with that brief, then edit the proposed criteria and candidate list. Every option is reviewed against the same priorities, with the evidence and unknowns kept visible.
What you get
The report explains the shortlist.
The report connects each option to its offer scope, evidence, unknowns, weighted fit, and supplier findings. Business and technical reviewers work from the same record.
Illustrative product example. Company names, domains, scores, and source counts are fictional.
MARKET STUDY · MD-2026-0412026-08-09 · CONFIDENTIAL
Contract lifecycle management platforms
§1 · Executive summary
Accordia Suite has the strongest weighted fit in this sample because its stated deployment and migration options match the target architecture. Sigilo costs less, but the sample includes security and licensing questions that need review. Ventra is held from further analysis because its website redirects and the offer could not be verified.
Proposed next step for human review
Consider taking Accordia Suite and Klarveld CLM into the RFP. Their sample weighted scores are 8.4 and 7.9. Reviewers should confirm the open commercial and technical questions before deciding.
§2 · Positioning
§3 to §5 · Solution profiles and offers
| Solution | Offer evaluated | Fit | Risk | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accordia Suiteaccordia.io | Suite + migration tooling · SaaS, EU region | 8.4 | Clear | 14 |
| Klarveld CLMklarveld.com | Platform + partner integration pack · SaaS / private | 7.9 | Clear | 11 |
| Sigilo Contractssigilo.eu | Core product + services · license | 6.1 | 2 signals | 9 |
| Novapactnovapact.io | Product only · on-prem | 5.2 | Low data | 4 |
| Ventra CLMventracm.com | Held for review: domain redirects and offer not verified | N/A | Review required | 3 |
Who it helps
One study, with a useful answer for every reviewer.
Each role can inspect the part of the decision it owns without losing the shared criteria, evidence, and rationale.
For business and transformation teams
Make the budget decision with a shortlist that shows fit, trade-offs, and open questions.
- See which options support the business outcome.
- Keep the trade-offs and decision owner visible.
How a study works
Begin with the question that is holding up the decision.
The workflow separates what Market Dog proposes from what your reviewers verify, adjust, and approve.
- 1
Frame the need
Describe the change, users, and constraints. Review and edit the criteria proposed from your brief.
- 2
Build and verify the candidate set
Add your own candidates or request suggestions. Market Dog records offer, identity, website, and sourced risk findings for review.
- 3
Review the evidence and scoring
Inspect citations, unknowns, confidence, weights, and manual adjustments before accepting the comparison.
- 4
Record the human choice
Choose the next step, explain the rationale, and export a decision package that others can challenge or revisit.
What the study checks
Market Dog checks the product and the company behind it.
A ranking is only useful when reviewers can see what supports it, what remains uncertain, and what a person changed.
Security35%Price20%
The ranking follows your priorities
Price may carry more weight in one study. In another, security or deployment may decide the order. You choose what matters.
Data breachAcquisitionreported May 2026
Dated supplier events stay visible
Sourced security, legal, and ownership events sit beside the evaluation with their date, so reviewers can decide what needs follow-up.
Human reviewDecision record
The final recommendation remains yours
Reviewers can change priorities, override a score with a reason, record the selected solution, and export the result.
Built for a decision that other people will review.
Market Dog keeps access, AI use, evidence, and decision ownership explicit throughout the study.
Pricing
Choose a plan for how often your team evaluates software.
Study limits apply to the studies stored in one company workspace. Analysis and export allowances renew monthly.
Free
$0forever
For a small team preparing its first shortlist.
- 1 stored study
- Up to 5 candidates per study
- 2 analysis runs and 5 exports per month
- Up to 3 accepted members
- 100 MB evidence storage
Pro
$29per seat / month
For teams that run software evaluations throughout the year.
- 10 stored studies
- Up to 15 candidates per study
- 25 analysis runs and 50 exports per month
- Up to 15 accepted members
- 5 GB evidence storage
Business
$79per seat / month
For procurement, architecture, and IT teams managing several studies.
- 50 stored studies
- Up to 40 candidates per study
- 100 analysis runs and 250 exports per month
- Up to 50 accepted members
- 50 GB evidence storage
Enterprise
Custom
For teams that need negotiated scale and commercial terms.
- No plan limit on stored studies
- Up to 100 candidates per study
- No plan limit on analyses or exports
- No plan limit on accepted members
- No plan limit on evidence storage
All limits apply to one company workspace. Archived studies still count toward the stored study limit; permanently deleting a study frees a slot. Monthly analysis and export allowances reset at the start of each UTC month. On paid plans, every accepted workspace member is billed as a seat, and platform AI usage is billed separately at provider cost, with no markup. Public checkout is monthly in USD. If your workspace uses its own AI provider key, that provider bills you directly.
Evaluation questions
What teams usually need to know before they start.
Straight answers about control, evidence, and the role of AI.
Can we bring our own candidates and criteria?
Yes. Add your own candidate list, edit the proposed criteria, change weights, and add disqualifying requirements.
What happens when evidence is missing or contradictory?
The study can keep a value unknown and preserve conflicting findings for review. Missing evidence should not become an invented score.
Does AI make the final decision?
No. AI can suggest candidates, structure research, and help explain a score. A person reviews the evidence and records the final choice.
What counts as a paid seat?
Every accepted workspace member counts as a seat, regardless of role. Pending invitations do not count until they are accepted.
Can I try Market Dog or pay annually?
Start on Free. The current public checkout is monthly and does not include a paid plan trial. Contact us to discuss annual commercial terms.
What happens to our data if we downgrade?
Your existing studies, evidence, and reports remain in the workspace. If current usage exceeds the new allowance, you cannot increase that usage until it falls below the limit or you upgrade.
Contact
Tell us what your team needs to decide.
Share the decision, team size, timing, and any procurement or security questions. We will route your message to the right person.
Start on Free